Guaranteed Rights for Shareholders
In October 2014 ShareSoc launched a campaign to give full rights to ALL shareholders.
In May 2018 we wrote to BEIS: click here for a copy of our joint letter from UKSA and ShareSoc to BEIS about SRD II.
Our second step is to ask members to write to their MP requesting that Government implement the Shareholder Rights Directive’s clear intent that the end investor should be identified on the company register.
Our third step is to ask a co-ordinated series of questions at company AGMs. All companies should want to communicate and better engage with their shareholders so it will be difficult for them not to agree with our goal.
Other steps in our campaign will be further meetings with BEIS, Government, FCA, etc; publicity via media; and contacting platforms and registrars to ask them to voluntarily agree to improve their systems, processes and service to individual investors. Click here for more info and copies of the pro-forma email to your MP and AGM question www.sharesoc.org/sharesoc-news/protect-your-rights-act-now/
At present most private investors purchase shares in nominee accounts. With a very few exceptions this means that they have no automatic rights to vote, to attend General Meetings of companies or even receive information on the affairs of the company. The nominee system disenfranchises the vast majority of private shareholders.
Commercial Interests have taken Precedence
This situation has arisen because the nominee system offers certain commercial attractions to stockbrokers and other financial market intermediaries, and because the Government has not given priority to the protection of the rights of individual investors.
Rights not Exercisable
Although in theory investors via nominee accounts have rights to vote, attend meetings and receive information under the Companies Act, those rights are in practice not exercisable, and are not exercised, by the vast majority of private investors. In addition many rights that are otherwise available to shareholders who are on the register of a company are lost.
Shareholder Democracy Destroyed
Shareholder democracy has been fatally undermined by the historic changes to the way the UK stock market operates to the detriment of good corporate governance in companies as the voice of individual shareholders is lost. Individual shareholders have a direct ownership interest rather than simply acting as agents for others as is the case with many institutional investors, so they are more likely to express concerns about management failings, excessive director pay and poor corporate governance.
You can get a verbal explanation from Roger Lawson of why shareholder rights are important and what needs to be done to improve the current situation by clicking on the YouTube video below.
A meeting was held on the 14th October 2014 to promote this campaign and several speakers explained how and why the current situation has come to pass. ShareSoc presented our conclusions on how it should be rectified. Speakers at the meeting were Stan Grierson and Roger Lawson from ShareSoc, Peter Swabey from ICSA, John Lee (Lord Lee of Trafford, a well known FT writer and private investor), John Kay (author of the Kay Review and FT writer), Paul Scott a well know private investor and blogger, Cas Sydorowitz from Georgesons and Michael Kempe from Capita representing the ICSA Registrars Group. A report of the meeting is present in this document: Shareholder-
If you wish to register an interest in this campaign, please use the Contact form on this website to request that you be added to our contact list for the Shareholder Rights Campaign. Please call 0333-
DOWNLOAD THE FULL ANALYSES
We have published two lengthy documents that contain a complete analysis of the issues on shareholder rights and how to resolve the problems. These can be downloaded from here: Guaranteed-
Defeating Shareholder Democracy
Examples of how the existing share holding arrangements defeat shareholder democracy and rights were given in this blog post in July 2015: Defeating-
In January 2016 the Government BIS Department published a Research Paper entitled “Exploring the Intermediated Shareholding Model”. It explains the mind-
Sign the Petition
A petition to support the changes required to enfranchise all shareholders is present below. Please sign it!
Write to Your M.P.
We urge supporters of this campaign to write to your Member of Parliament or any members of the House of Lords you may know. If you don’t know who your M.P. is you can find out by going to this web page: www.parliament.uk/business/commons (enter your post code in the box on the right) which also gives you their contact information. A template letter is present here: Word Version or PDF version but such letters are most effective if you personalise them in some way with your own comments so that it really grabs their attention! You could include past negative experiences associated with nominee accounts for example.
Please Support this Campaign Financially
Note that to make this an effective campaign we do need to spend money on it. ShareSoc has been contributing its own funds to this campaign, particularly to cover some of the initial launch costs, but we do need further funding to make this a high impact and successful campaign. Please use the form below to make a voluntary contribution via any debit or credit cards. Note that any funds contributed specifically to this campaign will be recorded separately and will only be spent on this campaign or otherwise to promote the rights or interests of individual shareholders if the campaign itself is subsequently terminated. You can also donate by cheque or by other means if you prefer –
Petition to H.M. Government, BEIS Department:
“That the Government ensures by changes to Laws and Regulations that ALL investors in public companies, including those who hold their shares in nominee accounts, shall have their holdings listed on the share register unless they specifically opt out. This will ensure that ALL investors, have the same rights including the right to receive company communications and to vote at General Meetings”