Pay and the Attitude of Institutional Investors

This blog gives you the latest topical news plus some informal comments on them from ShareSoc’s directors and other contributors. These are the personal comments of the authors and not necessarily the considered views of ShareSoc. The writers may hold shares in the companies mentioned. You can add your own comments on the blog posts, but note that ShareSoc reserves the right to remove or edit comments where they are inappropriate or defamatory.

An article in the Financial Times on Friday (30/9/2016) focussed on the resistance of business to Theresa May’s “responsible capitalism”. Although the article acknowledged the need for change, for example in the area of director remuneration. Lots of practical problems were raised – for example how to select suitable worker representatives for boards in international companies. But the really revealing comment was this one from Paul Lee, Head of Corporate Governance at Aberdeen Asset Management. He was quoted as saying: “If you are saying that shareholders should be able to give a green or red light on pay every year, then we are in danger of treading on the toes of the board and taking control of the pay decision. That is not our job”.

Well Mr Lee I suggest that is exactly what shareholders are saying and yes it is your job to decide what the directors are paid. Directors should not be deciding what they themselves get paid. That is one reason why pay has been growing out of all reasonable proportions.

Until institutions accept responsibility for deciding what the directors are paid, and whether it is a reasonable amount or not, nothing will change.

Roger Lawson

  1. Ian says:

    Good Lord. One might almost think Mr Lee doesn’t regard shareholders as owners of the company. I wonder if his cavalier approach to the rights of property owners would extend to his own property – his house, for example?

  2. Cliff Weight says:

    Investors have the power to stop the executive pay arms race-
    Shareholders should weigh in on compensation, says LGIM’s Sacha Sadan in the FT, but I think he is missing the point, which is:

    Investors do not have the power to curb directors’ pay. Fund managers who are merely intermediaries in the ownership chain have usurped this power and have failed to control directors’ pay. They are responsible for creating the current problems, yet to date seem to have avoided blame. Why should we expect them to suddenly change their behaviour? It is time for a strong input from Government and regulators of the London stock exchange to change the framework in which we are currently operating. I just hope we get more power back to the ultimate investors.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.