FCA Consultation
Consumer Investments Market Call for Input
ShareSoc’s response

A ShareSoc News item by ShareSoc Director Cliff Weight

In our response we highlighted:

  • The need for the system as a whole, including regulation, to work better for consumers
  • We welcome the clear recognition in the CFI’s Foreword that there is indeed a problem – that there are suitable and inexpensive products, but people do not use them enough. In addition, that firms are not generally keen to promote them and that progress is slower than the FCA would like.
  • The market runs largely in the interests of the providers of financial services, not in the interests of the consumers
  • The FCA states that its strategic objective is one of “ensuring that the relevant markets function well”. We would like the FCA to confirm unequivocally that ensuring good outcomes for consumers is how they intend to interpret their objective going forward.

We recommended these solutions:

1.     Tell the full truth about costs and charges, especially the importance of minimising, or avoiding altogether, annual percentage charges;

2.     Empower people by pointing out the simple, good value services they can actually use, that do not normally need the involvement of a financial adviser;

3.     There needs to be a step change in financial education at all ages. Financial education needs a radical reform and a much better plan;

4.     There is a wide spectrum of sophistication of financial knowledge among consumers. This spectrum from novices to experts needs to be taken into account. The solution is not to apply a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach which all too often produces a ‘nanny-state’ outcome. Most consumers see this a patronising and unhelpful.

5.     Better regulation.

We made specific recommendations for change in Q17, as a result of lessons from the Woodford scandal, and in Q21 about Pre-emption rights for minority shareholders.

ShareSoc and UKSA, the UK Shareholders’ Association worked closely in drafting our responses. However we have some differences of scope, perspective, and emphasis; hence we have made separate submissions to this CFI.

To read the ShareSoc response click here.

To read the Call for Input click here


One comment
  1. Mark Bentley says:

    Thanks for all your hard work on this CFI, Cliff.

    I have to take issue with this sentence, however “We would like the FCA to confirm unequivocally that ensuring good outcomes for consumers is how they intend to interpret their objective going forward.”

    I don’t believe it’s the FCA’s job (nor possible) to “ensure good outcomes”. Investment always carries risk and a good outcome can never be guaranteed. However, we do want the FCA to restrict the marketing of products likely to produce bad outcomes (e.g. dodgy bonds) and to severely sanction those who mislead consumers or don’t treat them fairly.

    The classification of “Sophisticated/Professional Investors” needs review. Current criteria are arbitrary and open to interpretation by brokers/platform. A skills/experience based classification would more appropriate.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.