EU Commission Proposes Overhaul of Prospectus Rules

This blog gives you the latest topical news plus some informal comments on them from ShareSoc’s directors and other contributors. These are the personal comments of the authors and not necessarily the considered views of ShareSoc. The writers may hold shares in the companies mentioned. You can add your own comments on the blog posts, but note that ShareSoc reserves the right to remove or edit comments where they are inappropriate or defamatory.

The EU Commission has published proposals to overhaul the rules on prospectuses, where companies are raising equity or debt in public markets. But prospectuses are costly to produce, especially for smaller companies.  As Ian Sayers of the AIC said after the above announcement: “One of the main problems with a prospectus is that the regime effectively compels issuers to include any information that an investor might conceivably want. Given the legal implications, the result is a huge amount of boilerplate of little value and huge complexity.”

Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union Jonathan Hill said: “We need a prospectus regime that gives investors the information they need, but that does not pile up unnecessary costs and put companies off raising money on the public markets. Today’s proposal strikes a better balance. It will make the system simpler, cheaper and quicker. It will safeguard investors, while making it easier for small and medium-sized enterprises and other businesses to raise money.”

The main changes proposed can be summarised as:

– The smallest capital raisings (less than €500,000) will no longer require a prospectus, and member states will be able to set even higher thresholds for their domestic markets.

– There will be a “lighter” prospectus for those companies with a market cap of less than €200 million (typically SMEs).

– Prospectuses should be shorter and clearer in future.

– Secondary issuance by existing listed companies will benefit from a new, simplified prospectus.

The proposed changes now have to be approved by the European Parliament and the Council of the EU. But these proposals are surely beneficial to all private investors.

For more information go to this web page:

Roger Lawson

One comment
  1. BrianG says:

    Thanks for highlighting this.
    All sounds sensible in principle. Lets hope something positive emerges. I do agree with the requirement for a prospectus, but currently they contain too much repetition, and seemingly worthless boilerplate.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.